Wishing all bloggers a Merry Christmas and a wonderful, peaceful 2007!
Sarah
Hello everyone,
Final papers
Here we are, ten weeks later, lots of logins, passwords and registrations later and you’ve all made it, every single one of you! I have been extremely impressed by the dedication with which you have approached each e-tivity, by your patience when there were technological challenges, and the insight of your blog posts. Now it’s time to “digest” everything. What I mean by “digest” is stop and think about what you’ve learned. Your final paper (that’s what this e-tivity is about) is a time for reflection. Reflecting on the experience of the last ten weeks, reflecting on social software, reflecting on the Web, reflecting on what you’ve learned an how you’ve changed. You’ve got several weeks to complete this one so take your time :-)
Sarah
Purpose: To reflect on what you’ve learned in this course and express your thoughts in the form of a final paper.
Task: You could write a final paper on the experience of using the social software, on social software itself, on one of the particular genres we have considered, etc. The choice is yours. Please take some time to consider what you would like to write about. You may be objective (like writing about what you’ve already started researching for your wiki contributions) or subjective (like what you’ve learned and how you think it might be useful for other students of English) or both. These are just some ideas; I’m sure you’ll come up with more creative interesting ones!
The paper should be about 3 pages (see Course Syllabus).
In the next few days, please send a comment to this message saying what you intend to write about.
After Christmas I will be sending a message with the rubrics I will be using to assess your papers and some indications on structure.
Timeline: January 17, though this is flexible. If you’ve got lots of exams to study for just let me know and I can extend the deadline. Please send your papers to me via email as a .doc.
Compliments to everyone! Not only did you manage to work on your wikis, but you did a very good job at looking at each other's contributions and giving useful feedback (Annalisa, Francesca and Lucrezia even managed to make changes based on your feedback). I think you all did a very good job at pointing out the good aspects and those that still needed to be worked on. It was also good to see that those of you who wrote feedback after others had already written READ what the others had written first. This means you're becoming REAL bloggers!
- you could use more bold to highlight key words
- is the introduction to the second paragraph useful?
- you could put the retrieval date of the link to our course
- is the example a pure repetition of the theoretical part?
- what about the sections Links, References, See?
(feedack before corrections made on Friday)
- you should integrate new contents with existing contents
- greater division into paragraphs
- you could use more bold to highlight key words
Then Annalisa gave a nice summary of your common mistakes, which could be interpreted as the following advice:
- avoid repetition of contents
- standardize how references and links are made
- use many short paragraphs rather than a few long ones
- internal links
- don’t use too many quotations
- use bold to highlight key words
All this said, I must say I agree with all of you that you have done an excellent job. It wasn’t easy, but as Maria Chiara says hopefully it’s definitely been a learning experience! I hope you can say the same for the course as a whole. I know that I have certainly learned a lot from all of you.
HI COLLEGUES!!
Hello everybody!
Hi bunch of wiki creators,
Hi everybody!!!
1) Francesca, Lucrezia and Annalisa worked on podcasts. First of all, I agree to what Svjetlana says in her post, that is that there is a kind of separation from their article and the rest of the page. Secondly, there are some repetions: some parts of the article could be integrated to some sections that already existed without the necessity of creating another one. Other advise is to put some words in bold and create some paragraphs. It makes the reading more easier.
2) Giorgia and Barbara's contribution is about blogs, the corrections they made are very good and now the article is easier to read than before. I can only give two pieces of advice to them: one is to put in bold more key words in order to catch the reader's attention in a better way and the other to use a more impersonal style even though we know that you can also write in first person.
3) Svjetlana contributed to language learning. The article is well structured so I can only say the same thing I've already said about Giorgia and Barbara's work: to put the key words of her text in bold type, for the same reason, that is to catch the reader's attention.
That's all...and the only thing I can add is VERY GOOD JOB!! ^__^
Cheers
Alice
Dear Sarah, Could you pealse tell me how to make an internal link on edutechwiki? Because I managed to do only few of them . The others displayed in red, what should I do? Let me know. Thaks
Hello everybody!
Cleaning up the wiki
You all did an excellent job during your first week of wiki-ing but I think it’s clear to us that we all still have a lot to learn and that there are improvements to be made. We will, therefore, dedicate another week to cleaning up and fixing up your wiki contributions. Fortunately you all seem to enjoy it and see how it can be useful, even if it’s not necessarily easy! I’m sure your wiki contributions will be very professional and academic in the end.
1 – Let’s do some more reading. Go to
Quoting, paraphrasing and summarising
Evaluating sources (hint: it might be helpful to save sites that are good resources in your del.icio.us page, of course with the bloggingenglish tag!)
- Is my contribution a series of quotations or is it my own paraphrase and summary with the addition of my own ideas and thoughts?
- Have I quoted sources and cited them correctly?
- Have I compiled a correct bibliography?
- Have I made internal links to other pages in the wiki (e.g. if you use the word “wiki” have you made it a link like this: [[wiki]])?
- Have I been clear and concise?
- Have I used paragraphs, divisions and bold to make selective reading easier?